How it works

Frame the decision

Set out the property decision, the options genuinely on the table, and the assumptions each one rests on.

Model the outcomes

corresmo models each option under the same financial and accounting logic, so every option is judged on a level footing.

Take it to the board

Present a recommendation with the evidence attached — comparable numbers, compliant treatment, and a full trail of how you got there.

The platform

A working view of corresmo, which is in active development. These are the actual screens from the working software, not mock-ups; the data in them is illustrative.

Inputs

Wrapper-level scenario selection matrix — A modular approach to scenario-building, requiring inputs to be entered only once across multiple options

Input tiles for the selected transaction type — Input requirements are restricted to those required to model the selected transaction type. Users cannot submit incomplete proposals

Outputs

Options comparison dashboard — Comparing occupancy scenarios on consistent assumptions, with one option recommended

Board-ready business case summary — A board-ready summary: the recommendation, the range of outcomes, and the accounting treatment behind it

Workflow

Approval levels defined for each region — Users with administrator rights define the criteria by which approval levels are measured. These controls sit with the client alone

Built for the people who have to defend the number

Zero

Accounting expertise required. IFRS 16, IAS 36 and IAS 37 treatment is handled invisibly by the calculation engine. Real estate teams work in transactions — corresmo handles the accounting.

Corporate real estate teams

Turn portfolio judgement into cases that survive scrutiny from finance and the board.

Finance directors and CFOs

See the accounting consequences of a property decision before it is made, not after.

Advisors and intermediaries

Put a consistent, auditable modelling framework behind the advice you give your clients.